Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Outcome of cervical cancer patients with single-node compared with no nodal involvement treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy
Authors: Prapaporn Suprasert
Kittipat Charoenkwan
Sitthicha Siriaree
Chalong Cheewakriangkrai
Jaruwan Saeteng
Jatupol Srisomboon
Keywords: Medicine
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2013
Abstract: Objective To evaluate disease-free survival (DFS) after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL) among early-stage cervical cancer patients with single-node involvement versus patients with no nodal involvement. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records of 843 patients undergoing RHPL at Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand, between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2008. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered when the operative schedule was more than 1 month after diagnosis and adjuvant chemoradiation was administered to high-risk patients. Five subgroups were defined on the basis of pelvic node involvement: group A (0 nodes; n = 706), group B (1 node; n = 65), group C (2 nodes; n = 38), group D (3 nodes; n = 13), and group E (≥ 4 nodes; n = 21). Results The 5-year DFS was comparable for groups A and B (94.3% versus 92.1%; P = 0.454). In groups C, D, and E, the 5-year DFS was 85.9%, 75.0%, and 61.8%, respectively. The survival outcomes for groups A and B were significantly different from those of the other 3 groups (P < 0.001). Conclusion Cervical cancer patients with single-node involvement had comparable survival outcomes to those without nodal metastases; however, patients with multiple node involvement had reduced DFS. © 2012 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
ISSN: 18793479
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.