Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/77536
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChalardchay Pratoomcharten_US
dc.contributor.authorPitchayaponne Klunklinen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomsak Wanwilairaten_US
dc.contributor.authorWannapha Nobnopen_US
dc.contributor.authorKittikun Kittidachananen_US
dc.contributor.authorImjai Chitapanaruxen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:32:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:32:52Z-
dc.date.issued2021-07-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85110698980en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1371/journal.pone.0254934en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85110698980&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/77536-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Left-sided post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) certainly precedes some radiation dose to the cardiopulmonary organs causing many side effects. To reduce the cardiopulmonary dose, we created a new option of the breathing adapted technique by using abdominal compression applied with a patient in deep inspiration phase utilizing shallow breathing. This study aimed to compare the use of abdominal compression with shallow breathing (ACSB) with the free breathing (FB) technique in the left-sided PMRT. Materials and methods: Twenty left-sided breast cancer patients scheduled for PMRT were enrolled. CT simulation was performed with ACSB and FB technique in each patient. All treatment plans were created on a TomoTherapy planning station. The target volume and dose, cardiopulmonary organ volume and dose were analyzed. A linear correlation between cardiopulmonary organ volumes and doses were also tested. Results: Regarding the target volumes and dose coverage, there were no significant differences between ACSB and FB technique. For organs at risk, using ACSB resulted in a significant decrease in mean (9.17 vs 9.81 Gy, p<0.0001) and maximum heart dose (43.79 vs 45.45 Gy, p = 0.0144) along with significant reductions in most of the evaluated volumetric parameters. LAD doses were also significantly reduced by ACSB with mean dose 19.24 vs 21.85 Gy (p = 0.0036) and the dose to 2% of the volume (D2%) 34.46 vs 37.33 Gy (p = 0.0174) for ACSB and FB technique, respectively. On the contrary, the lung dose metrics did not show any differences except the mean V5 of ipsilateral lung. The positive correlations were found between increasing the whole lung volume and mean heart dose (p = 0.05) as well as mean LAD dose (p = 0.041) reduction. Conclusions: The ACSB technique significantly reduced the cardiac dose compared with the FB technique in left-sided PMRT treated by Helical TomoTherapy. Our technique is uncomplicated, well-tolerated, and can be applied in limited resource center.en_US
dc.subjectMultidisciplinaryen_US
dc.titleThe advantages of abdominal compression with shallow breathing during left-sided postmastectomy radiotherapy by Helical TomoTherapyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitlePLoS ONEen_US
article.volume16en_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.