Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76998
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNaraporn Maikongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPerada Kantakamen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrangmalee Leurcharusmeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorApichat Sinthubuaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPasuk Mahakkanukrauhen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:21:15Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:21:15Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn07179502en_US
dc.identifier.issn07179367en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85118102529en_US
dc.identifier.other10.4067/S0717-95022021000501473en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85118102529&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76998-
dc.description.abstractSonographic identification of suprascapular nerve (SSN) is essential for diagnosis of suprascapular neuropathy and ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block. This study aims to demonstrate the accuracy of identification of SSN at supraclavicular region by ultrasonography in fresh cadavers. Ninety-three posterior cervical triangles were examined. With ultrasonography, SSN emerging from the upper trunk of brachial plexus was identified and followed until it passed underneath the inferior belly of omohyoid muscle. Sonographic visualization of SSN in supraclavicular fossa was recorded. Then, cadaveric dissection was performed to determine the presence or absence of SSN. An agreement between sonographic identification and direct visualization was specified and categorized the following three patterns: “correctly identified” (pattern I), “incorrectly identified” (pattern II), and “unidentified” (pattern III). The identification of SSN using sonography was correct in almost 90 %. The diameter of SSN with pattern I was the largest compared to those of other two patterns. In pattern I, SSN ran laterally from the upper trunk of brachial plexus and passed underneath the inferior belly of omohyoid muscle. Therefore, SSN was easily identified under ultrasonography. In pattern II, nerve identified by ultrasonography was literally the dorsal scapular nerve.In pattern III, SSN was unable to be identified because of its anatomical variation. The accuracy of ultrasonographic identification of SSN at supraclavicular fossa is high and the key sonoanatomical landmarks are the lateral margin of brachial plexus and the inferior belly of omohyoid muscle. The anatomical variants of SSN are reasons of incorrect or unable identification of SSN under ultrasonography.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAccuracy of sonographic identification of suprascapular nerve at supraclavicular fossa: A cadaveric studyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Morphologyen_US
article.volume39en_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.