Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76996
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWachira Wongtanasarasinen_US
dc.contributor.authorThatchapon Thepchindaen_US
dc.contributor.authorChayada Kasirawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorSuchada Saetiaoen_US
dc.contributor.authorJirayupat Leungvorawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorNichanan Kittivorakanchaien_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:21:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:21:13Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0974519Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn09742700en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85122456632en_US
dc.identifier.other10.4103/JETS.JETS_35_21en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122456632&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76996-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Despite the standard guidelines stating that giving epinephrine for patients with cardiac arrest is recommended, the clinical benefits of epinephrine for patients with traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are still limited. This study aims to evaluate the benefits of epinephrine administration in traumatic OHCA patients. Methods: We searched four electronic databases up to June 30, 2020, without any language restriction in research sources. Studies comparing epinephrine administration for traumatic OHCA patients were included. Two independent authors performed the selection of relevant studies, data extraction, and assessment of the risk of bias. The primary outcome was inhospital survival rate. Secondary outcomes included prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), short-term survival, and favorable neurological outcome. We calculated the odds ratios (ORs) of those outcomes using the Mantel-Haenszel model and assessed the heterogeneity using the I 2 statistic. Results: Four studies were included. The risk of bias of the included studies was low, except for one study in which the risk of bias was fair. All included studies reported the inhospital survival rate. Epinephrine administration during traumatic OHCA might not demonstrate a benefit for inhospital survival (OR: 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11-3.37). Epinephrine showed no significant improvement in prehospital ROSC (OR: 4.67, 95% CI: 0.66-32.81). In addition, epinephrine might not increase the chance of short-term survival (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.53-3.79). Conclusion: The use of epinephrine for traumatic OHCA may not improve either inhospital survival or prehospital ROSC and short-term survival. Epinephrine administration as indicated in standard advanced life support algorithms might not be routinely used in traumatic OHCA.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleTreatment outcomes of epinephrine for traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shocken_US
article.volume14en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.