Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76914
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNongyao Kasatpibalen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomjai Sirakamonen_US
dc.contributor.authorYodying Punjasawadwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorJittaporn Chitreecheuren_US
dc.contributor.authorNarain Chotirosniramiten_US
dc.contributor.authorParichat Pakvipasen_US
dc.contributor.authorJo Anne D. Whitneyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:20:17Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:20:17Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15498425en_US
dc.identifier.issn15498417en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85120803361en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1097/PTS.0000000000000453en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120803361&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76914-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: A surgical safety checklist has been a globally implemented and mandated adoption in several countries. However, its use is not mandatory in Thailand. This study aimed to evaluate the perceptions of surgical personnel on surgical complications and safety and to examine the satisfaction and barriers of surgical safety checklist implementation. Methods: A survey study was performed between November 2013 and February 2015 in 61 Thai hospitals. A questionnaire capturing demographics, perceptions related to surgical complications and safety, and the satisfaction and barriers of surgical safety checklist implementation was distributed to surgical personnel. Results: A total of 2024 surgical personnel were recruited. Nearly all of them reported experience or knowledge of an adverse surgical event (99.6%). Most thought that it could be preventable (98.2%) and quality care improvement could help reduce the occurrence of adverse events (97.7%). Overall, respondents reported a high level of satisfaction with the checklist (mean[SD] = 3.79[0.71]). The three areas of highest satisfaction were benefit to the patient (mean [SD] = 4.11[0.69]), benefit to the organization (mean [SD] = 4.05[0.68]), and reduction in adverse events (mean [SD] = 4.02[0.69]). Overall, the barrier for implementation of the checklist was rated as moderate (mean[SD] = 2.52[0.99]). However, the means of barriers in each period, sign in, time out, and sign out, were rated as low (means [SD] = 2.41[1.07], 2.50[1.03], and 2.34[1.01], respectively). Conclusions: The data document that the satisfaction with the checklist are fairly high. However, some barriers were identified. Efforts to increase understanding through more rigorous policy enforcement and strategic support may lead to improving the checklist implementation.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.titleSatisfaction and barriers of surgical safety checklist implementation in a nonmandatory adoption resource-limited Countryen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Patient Safetyen_US
article.volume17en_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Washingtonen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.