Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76729
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChaicharn Pothiraten_US
dc.contributor.authorWarawut Chaiwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorAtikun Limsukonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNittaya Phetsuken_US
dc.contributor.authorNonglak Chetsadaphanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWoranoot Choomuangen_US
dc.contributor.authorChalerm Liwsrisakunen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:16:02Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:16:02Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn22288694en_US
dc.identifier.issn0125877Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85082332976en_US
dc.identifier.other10.12932/AP-210618-0348en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082332976&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76729-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Inhaler devices are a keystone in the management of asthma during the maintenance phase of treatment. Objective: To evaluate techniques for using inhaler devices in asthma patients. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted to assess patient compliance with correct techniques for using inhaler devices across three regimens: pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), Accuhaler®, and Turbuhaler®. The compliance of patients with essential steps for correct device usage in the case of each regimen was recorded. These were recorded when patients presented for a routine visit and one month after receiving face-to-face training. The percentage of compliance between the use of the devices and the risk factors related to incorrect techniques were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. The percentages of incorrect techniques were compared between the two visits using a Chi-squared test. Results: A total of 108 asthma patients (35.2% male), with a mean age of 57.5 ± 12.3 years were evaluated. Percentages of incorrect use of Accuhaler®, pMDI, and Turbuhaler® were 50%, 48%, and 55.6%, respectively. The most common incorrectness’s is breath out gently to residual volume (approximately one-third). Previous treatment by a pulmonologist for less than 2 years was the single factor related to incorrect technique [Adjusted OR = 2.8 (95%CI, 1.2-6.3), p = 0.02]. Formal training resulted in a statistically significant decrease in percentage of incorrect techniques (52.8% vs. 32.1%, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Inhalation technique in asthma patients was mostly unsatisfactory, especially in patients who had been treated by a pulmonologist for less than 2 years. Face-to-face training significantly improved good technique in all devices.en_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleReal-world observational study of the evaluation of inhaler techniques in asthma patientsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleAsian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunologyen_US
article.volume39en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.