Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76649
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRatana Sapbamreren_US
dc.contributor.authorSurat Hongsibsongen_US
dc.contributor.authorManoch Naksataen_US
dc.contributor.authorWimol Naksataen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:14:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:14:32Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn16604601en_US
dc.identifier.issn16617827en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85102003232en_US
dc.identifier.other10.3390/ijerph18052624en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85102003232&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76649-
dc.description.abstractFarmers are at a high risk of inhalation exposure when handling pesticides. Thai farmers usually protect themselves against pesticide exposure by wearing commercial respiratory protective equipment (RPE) available from rural community markets. However, scientific data regarding the pesticide filtration efficiency of RPE commonly worn by farmers is limited. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the efficiency of insecticide filtration of various RPE commonly worn by farmers in Thailand. The half facepiece respirator was used as a control to compare the results with other RPE. Ten types of RPE were selected for testing. The filtration efficiency of each RPE against insecticides was tested in a laboratory. The remarkable findings were that a surgical mask demonstrated the least filtration efficiency of all tested insecticides, with a range of 25.7–61.5%. The RPE available in rural markets of Thailand had a filtration efficiency within a range of 64.9–95.4%, whereas a half facepiece respirator was the most efficient in filtering insecticides, with a range of 96.5–98.9%. Therefore, our results suggest that the RPE most frequently worn by farmers may not provide adequate protection when compared with the respirator. However, considerations around RPE use in low-and middle-income countries and tropical climate conditions should be based on pesticide toxicity and practical use, ensuring balance between the risks from pesticide exposure and acceptance of PPE use.en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleInsecticide filtration efficiency of respiratory protective equipment commonly worn by farmers in Thailanden_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthen_US
article.volume18en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.