Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76328
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWeerapot Wanajaroenen_US
dc.contributor.authorThierry Lépineen_US
dc.contributor.authorChristophe Buisseten_US
dc.contributor.authorMatthieu Castelnauen_US
dc.contributor.authorVincent Costesen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuwicha Wannawichianen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaran Poshyachindaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBoonrucksar Soonthornthumaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:08:26Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:08:26Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1996756Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn0277786Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85116020003en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1117/12.2600232en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116020003&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76328-
dc.description.abstractOver the past twenty years, a very high number of different space hyperspectral spectrometers have been designed, developed and launched. Recently, several new compact designs based on freeform optics have been proposed in the literature. We thus considered that it was interesting to make a survey of the already existing hyperspectral imagers and innovative freeform designs to identify the most promising solutions to increase the compactness and the performance. Some surveys on hyperspectral imagers have already been done in the past. For example, the survey by Herring et al, in 1993 which proposed some hyperspectral spectrometer concepts. However, these studies are now outdated and cannot be used to identify state of art concepts. The review proposed by Kumar et al., in 2015 presented the advantages to browse the different hyperspectral imager concepts but provided only superficial technical details that cannot be used to identify the specific designs that improve both the compactness and the image and spectral qualities. We thus decided to make a bibliographic survey to analyze the most recent designs of different space hyperspectral imagers with the objective to select the concepts that will provide the best compromise between the volume and the performance. We have categorized the different systems into four groups: prism based, Offner, Three Mirror Anastigmat (TMA) and Dyson spectrometers. We analyzed these different concepts and we identified and the advantages and the drawbacks. We concluded that the most interesting state-of-art designs are the Freeform Offner, double-pass TMA and Dyson spectrometers. These designs present the most interesting performance and combine with a compact volume. We thus established a preliminary trade-off that summarizes the advantages and the drawback of these concepts. This trade-off analysis could be used as a starting point for any future study aiming at designing compact hyperspectral imager. Finally, we present the progress of some important and recent technological developments related to the manufacturing of freeform and convex gratings.en_US
dc.subjectComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectMaterials Scienceen_US
dc.subjectMathematicsen_US
dc.subjectPhysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.titleHyperspectral spectro-imager survey for state of art concept identificationen_US
dc.typeConference Proceedingen_US
article.title.sourcetitleProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineeringen_US
article.volume11852en_US
article.stream.affiliationsLaboratoire Hubert Curien UMR CNRS 5516en_US
article.stream.affiliationsInstitut d'Optique Graduate Schoolen_US
article.stream.affiliationsCNES Centre National d'Etudes Spatialesen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNational Astronomical Research Institute of Thailanden_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.