Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76232
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSokkeang Tryen_US
dc.contributor.authorKriengsak Panuwatwanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorGanchai Tanapornraweekiten_US
dc.contributor.authorManop Kaewmoracharoenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:07:15Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:07:15Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn10990542en_US
dc.identifier.issn10613773en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85104433057en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1002/cae.22422en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104433057&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76232-
dc.description.abstractThe social distancing measure imposed worldwide to combat the outbreak of the novel coronavirus has seen rapid adoption of technologies to support online education. Compared to traditional lecture-based courses, online teaching is particularly more challenging for laboratory courses where hands-on activities are essential to achieve the learning outcomes. To deal with this issue, the study presented in this paper was aimed to: (1) to develop a virtual reality (VR) application to aid a civil engineering laboratory course, and (2) to measure the potential of the VR-aided learning (VRAL) application in civil engineering education by assessing the learners' preferences toward VRAL compared to instructor-aided learning (IAL) and video-aided learning (VAL). Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, a comparison was conducted with 21 civil engineering students from both undergraduate and graduate levels. The results indicated that VRAL was more preferable than VAL by the participants based on the aspects of “interactivity” (the ability to provide theoretical and practical learning environments to the learners), “cognitive interest” (the ability to drive learners to engage in learning activity), “ease of understanding the content” (the ability to provide a clear lecture interpretation, i.e., easy to understand), and “support for learning” (the ability to help learners to achieve the learning goal). Although VRAL was comparatively less preferable than IAL by the participants overall, it was viewed as better in terms of cognitive interest and “accessibility” (the ability to provide learners with better access to the learning approach in terms of time and location). Complementing previous research, the findings supported the benefits of VR applications to aid civil engineering education.en_US
dc.subjectComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleVirtual reality application to aid civil engineering laboratory course: A multicriteria comparative studyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleComputer Applications in Engineering Educationen_US
article.volume29en_US
article.stream.affiliationsSirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.