Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76109
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHideo Hasegawaen_US
dc.contributor.authorShohei Omokawaen_US
dc.contributor.authorYasuaki Nakanishien_US
dc.contributor.authorKenichi Nakanoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMitsuyuki Nagashimaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanit Sananpanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorKenji Kawamuraen_US
dc.contributor.authorPasuk Mahakkanukrauhen_US
dc.contributor.authorYasuhito Tanakaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:05:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:05:44Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15326500en_US
dc.identifier.issn10582746en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85138825535en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.026en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85138825535&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76109-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The causes of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow are unclear. The authors hypothesized that the humeral trochlea protrudes into the cubital tunnel during elbow flexion and causes a dynamic morphologic change of the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel. Methods: An ultrasonic probe was fixed to the ulnar shafts of 10 fresh cadavers with an external fixator, and dynamic morphology of the cubital tunnel and ulnar nerve was observed. The distance from the Osborne band to the trochlea (OTD), distance from ulnar nerve center to the trochlea (UTD), and the short- and long-axis diameters of the nerve at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of elbow flexion were recorded. We compared the OTD, UTD, and the flattening of the ulnar nerve at the different angles of flexion using single-factor analysis of variance. Correlation between the ulnar nerve flattering, OTD, and UTD was examined using Spearman correlation coefficient. A P value less than.05 was used to denote statistical significance. Results: Flattening of the ulnar nerve progressed with increasing elbow flexion and was significantly different between 0° and 60°, 90°, and 120° (P =.03 at 60°, P <.01 at 90° and 120°). OTD decreased with elbow flexion, and there was a significant difference at all elbow flexion angles (all P <.01). UTD decreased significantly from 0° flexion to 90° flexion (P =.03). Flattening of the nerve was significantly correlated with the OTD (r = 0.66, P <.01). Conclusions: A positive correlation was found between the protrusion of the humeral trochlea into the cubital tunnel during elbow flexion and ulnar nerve flattening using cadaveric elbow and ultrasonography.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDynamic analysis of the ulnar nerve and cubital tunnel morphology using ultrasonography: a cadaveric studyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeryen_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNara Medical Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.