Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/75677
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMitsuyuki Nagashimaen_US
dc.contributor.authorShohei Omokawaen_US
dc.contributor.authorYasuaki Nakanishien_US
dc.contributor.authorPasuk Mahakkanukrauhen_US
dc.contributor.authorHideo Hasegawaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTakamasa Shimizuen_US
dc.contributor.authorKenji Kawamuraen_US
dc.contributor.authorYasuhito Tanakaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:01:51Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:01:51Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712474en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85137093826en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s12891-022-05786-9en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85137093826&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/75677-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Cubital tunnel syndrome can be caused by overtraction and dynamic compression in elbow deformities. The extent to which elbow deformities contribute to ulnar nerve strain is unknown. Here, we investigated ulnar nerve strain caused by cubitus valgus/varus deformity using fresh-frozen cadavers. Methods: We used six fresh-frozen cadaver upper extremities. A strain gauge was placed on the ulnar nerve 2 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle of the humerus. For the elbow deformity model, osteotomy was performed at the distal humerus, and plate fixation was performed to create cubitus valgus/varus deformities (10°, 20°, and 30°). Ulnar nerve strain caused by elbow flexion (0–125°) was measured in both the normal and deformity models. The strains at different elbow flexion angles within each model were compared, and the strains at elbow extension and at maximum elbow flexion were compared between the normal model and each elbow deformity model. However, in the cubitus varus model, the ulnar nerve deflected more than the measurable range of the strain gauge; elbow flexion of 60° or more were considered effective values. Statistical analysis of the strain values was performed with Friedman test, followed by the Williams’ test (the Shirley‒Williams’ test for non-parametric analysis). Results: In all models, ulnar nerve strain increased significantly from elbow extension to maximal flexion (control: 13.2%; cubitus valgus 10°: 13.6%; cubitus valgus 20°: 13.5%; cubitus valgus 30°: 12.2%; cubitus varus 10°: 8.3%; cubitus varus 20°: 8.2%; cubitus varus 30°: 6.3%, P < 0.001). The control and cubitus valgus models had similar values, but the cubitus varus models revealed that this deformity caused ulnar nerve relaxation. Conclusions: Ulnar nerve strain significantly increased during elbow flexion. No significant increase in strain 2 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle was observed in the cubitus valgus model. Major changes may have been observed in the measurement behind the medial epicondyle. In the cubitus varus model, the ulnar nerve was relaxed during elbow extension, but this effect was reduced by elbow flexion.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleA cadaveric study of ulnar nerve strain at the elbow associated with cubitus valgus/varus deformityen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleBMC Musculoskeletal Disordersen_US
article.volume23en_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNara Medical Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.