Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/75452
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUgyen Yangchenen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaweena Suebsombuten_US
dc.contributor.authorTashi Lhamoen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhub Dorjien_US
dc.contributor.authorSuepphong Chernbumroongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPradorn Sureephongen_US
dc.contributor.authorSylvain Toucharden_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T06:59:43Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T06:59:43Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-03en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85106609590en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1109/ECTIDAMTNCON51128.2021.9425772en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85106609590&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/75452-
dc.description.abstractSmart agriculture is just beginning to emerge and there are only a few instances of the use of smart technologies in Bhutan. This study aimed to understand the farming activity, their ability and experience with smart farming for designing appropriate learning tools for farmers to enhance agricultural production. Fifty respondents (34 females and 16 male) from Barp gewog (block), Punakha District were randomly selected and interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire the findings showed that the majority (56 %) used smartphones, among them 52 % used for communication and 32 % for taking photos. Radio and TV were the sources of information on the weather forecast (86 %), and agricultural-related information (70 %). More than 80% of respondents fall below the basic level in all aspects of digital literacy. For the management of crops, 72 % applied both chemical and organic fertilizers, 26 % used organic fertilizers and 2 % used chemical fertilizers to maintain soil fertility. Many adopted mechanical ways (85.7%) to manage pest and disease and manual weeding (76%) to manage weeds in the field the Majority (86%) of the respondents directly sold produce to consumers in the market and no webpage were used to sell their agricultural products the majority (92 %) did not have a business model to sale agricultural product and none used software or technology to plan for business. Besides, none of the respondents had adopted smart farming technology nor had any experience with smart farming. In conclusion, farmers have limited knowledge on the use of smart technology for agriculture.en_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.titlePreliminary study on Smart farming literacy: A case study in Barp gewog, Punakha District, Bhutanen_US
dc.typeConference Proceedingen_US
article.title.sourcetitle2021 Joint 6th International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with 4th ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunication Engineering, ECTI DAMT and NCON 2021en_US
article.stream.affiliationsRoyal University of Bhutanen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversité Lumière Lyon 2en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.