Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/74320
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKhomsan Rinriden_US
dc.contributor.authorPassorn Wonnapinijen_US
dc.contributor.authorSupachai Vuttipongchaikijen_US
dc.contributor.authorArawan Shutsrirungen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnongpat Suttangkakulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T06:40:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T06:40:01Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn2452316Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn24681458en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85139266559en_US
dc.identifier.other10.34044/J.ANRES.2022.56.4.14en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85139266559&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/74320-
dc.description.abstractImportance of the work: Metagenomic analysis has been used to study environmental microbial diversity. However, isolating soil DNA for metagenomic analysis can be problematic. Objectives: To evaluate six methods for extracting DNA from soil growing major crops in Thailand. Materials & Methods: DNA from soil growing rice, maize, oil palm or cassava was manually extracted and analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis and spectroscopy. The presence of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-inhibiting contaminants was assessed based on 16s rRNA amplification. Then, agarose gel purification was evaluated for its efficiency in removing the impurities. Results: The Tanveer and Gupta D protocols yielded the highest amount of DNA on average, while the Gupta C and Gupta E protocols produced clear genomic DNA bands. However, all DNA samples were contaminated with PCR inhibitors. Therefore, additional purification was needed. Agarose gel purification was performed only on DNA from the Gupta C and Gupta E protocols, with genomic bands detected. The purification removed sufficient contaminants with an average recovery rate of 50%, with Gupta C having a higher recovery rate variation. The statistical analyses applied to the concentration and absorbance ratios of purified DNA showed that the Gupta E protocol was suitable for soil growing oil palm and maize, whereas the Gupta C protocol was appropriate for soil growing rice and cassava. Main finding: An appropriate DNA extraction method with an additional purification process should be selected for different soil types to obtain qualified samples for metagenome analysis.en_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.titleAssessing DNA extraction methods for metagenomic analysis from crop soil in Thailanden_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleAgriculture and Natural Resourcesen_US
article.volume56en_US
article.stream.affiliationsKasetsart Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.