Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/73099
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChamard Wongsaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhichayut Phinyoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMongkhon Sompornrattanaphanen_US
dc.contributor.authorThanachit Krikeeratien_US
dc.contributor.authorLalita Lumkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorTorpong Thongngarmen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T08:35:35Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-27T08:35:35Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn22132198en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85125912929en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.jaip.2022.01.046en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85125912929&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/73099-
dc.description.abstractBackground: House dust mite sublingual immunotherapy (HDM SLIT) effectively treats allergic rhinitis (AR). However, the evidence of HDM SLIT for allergic asthma remained limited. Objective: To systematically review the efficacy and safety of HDM SLIT tablets in patients with allergic asthma. Methods: We performed a systematic search through PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Center of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that addressed the efficacy and safety of HDM SLIT tablets compared with placebo or no intervention in allergic asthma from their inception date until September 2021. The primary outcome was the reduction in inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) dose. Additional outcomes were asthma control, exacerbation, lung function, quality-of-life, and adverse events. Results: There were 7 RCTs, 5 studies in allergic asthma (4 in adults and 1 in children), and 2 in AR with or without asthma. The 6 standardized quality (SQ) HDM effectively reduced ICS dose in well- to partly controlled mild-to-moderate asthma in 1 RCT. Two RCTs evaluated the efficacy of 6 SQ and 12 SQ HDM in reducing asthma exacerbation in partly controlled moderate-to-severe asthma, and their results were inconsistent. One study in children with mild-to-moderate asthma found no benefit of HDM SLIT. Two RCTs in AR with or without mild-to-moderate asthma showed improvement of asthma symptoms. Adverse events were primarily local, and anaphylaxis treated with epinephrine was reported in 3 patients. Conclusions: The HDM SLIT tablets tend to effectively reduce ICS use in adults and adolescents with well- to partly controlled mild-to-moderate allergic asthma with a favorable safety profile.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEfficacy and Safety of House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablet in Allergic Asthma: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trialsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practiceen_US
article.volume10en_US
article.stream.affiliationsSiriraj Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.