Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/73078
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSutthikit Pipatsrisawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorJakkrit Klaphajoneen_US
dc.contributor.authorKittipong Kitisaken_US
dc.contributor.authorSomporn Sungkaraten_US
dc.contributor.authorPakorn Wivatvongvanaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T08:35:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-27T08:35:18Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712377en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85126513869en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s12883-022-02607-3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126513869&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/73078-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Strokes have recently become a leading cause of disability among Thai people. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) seems to give promising results in stroke recovery when combined with standard rehabilitation programs. Objective: To evaluate the combined effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the non-lesional primary motor cortex on upper limb motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. No reports of a combination of these two techniques of NIBS were found in the relevant literature. Methods: This pilot study was a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial of ten patients with subacute stroke admitted to the Rehabilitation Medicine Inpatient Unit, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Chiang Mai University. They were randomized into two groups: five in an active and five in a sham intervention group. Fugl-Meyer’s upper extremity motor score (FMA-UE) and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) were used to assess motor recovery at baseline, immediately, and 1 week after stimulation. Results: A two-way repeated ANOVA (mixed design) showed a significant improvement in FMA-UE scores in the active intervention group both immediately and 1 week after stimulation in comparison to the baseline, [time, F (2, 16) = 27.44, p < 0.001, time x group interaction, F (2, 16) = 13.29, p < 0.001]. Despite no statistical significance, a trend toward higher WMFT scores was shown in the active intervention group. Conclusions: A single session of low-frequency rTMS and cathodal tDCS over the non-lesional primary motor cortex may enhance upper limb motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEffects of combining two techniques of non-invasive brain stimulation in subacute stroke patients: a pilot studyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleBMC Neurologyen_US
article.volume22en_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.