Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/72821
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlexandre Hikiji Watanabeen_US
dc.contributor.authorShaun Wen Huey Leeen_US
dc.contributor.authorChatree Chai-Adisaksophaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMing Y. Limen_US
dc.contributor.authorNathorn Chaiyakunapruken_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T08:30:11Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-27T08:30:11Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn22121102en_US
dc.identifier.issn22121099en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85119182680en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.vhri.2021.07.003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85119182680&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/72821-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To examine the budget impact of emicizumab as prophylactic therapy in reducing the frequency of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A with inhibitors in Malaysia. Methods: A budget impact model was built to assess the cost implication of introducing emicizumab for routine prophylaxis of bleeding episodes in people with hemophilia A with inhibitors. It was based on the public healthcare system in Malaysia over a 5-year duration. The primary analysis computed healthcare costs for emicizumab compared with no prophylactic regimen to calculate the budget needed to treat all patients with hemophilia A with inhibitors. Results: The introduction of emicizumab resulted in a total incremental budget of Malaysian Ringgit (RM) 20 356 897 ($4 917 125) during the first year. The total cost for the current situation (no prophylaxis) was RM13 425 941 ($3 242 981), whereas the total cost for the new situation (prophylaxis with emicizumab) was RM33 782 838 ($8 160 106). The 5-year cumulative incremental budget impact from 2021 to 2025 was RM97 205 459 ($23 479 579) with an uncertainty range from −RM4 869 886 (−$1 176 301) to RM138 035 597 ($33 341 932) and a total of 72 patients treated with emicizumab. In a sensitivity analysis, the use of emicizumab was cost saving if the annual bleeding rate was greater than 16 instead of 6 times per year. Conclusion: The 5-year budget impact might be considered reasonable and possibly cost saving. The model and approach used in this study to obtain relevant parameters where scarce data exist may help other jurisdictions with future adaptation.en_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Financeen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceuticsen_US
dc.titleBudget Impact of Emicizumab for Routine Prophylaxis of Bleeding Episodes in Patients With Hemophilia A With Inhibitorsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleValue in Health Regional Issuesen_US
article.volume28en_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Utah School of Medicineen_US
article.stream.affiliationsMonash University Malaysiaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Utah Healthen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Pennsylvaniaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.