Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/72638
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVorasate Thanasaksukthaweeen_US
dc.contributor.authorNipada Santhaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchradh Saentonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNakorn Tippayawongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPirat Jaroonpattanapongen_US
dc.contributor.authorJalal Foroozeshen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuparit Tangparitkulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T08:27:27Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-27T08:27:27Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-07en_US
dc.identifier.issn15205029en_US
dc.identifier.issn08870624en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85126581934en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c04398en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126581934&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/72638-
dc.description.abstractAs one of the solutions to tackle climate change caused by excess carbon dioxide (CO2) emission, CO2geological storage has been increasingly implemented globally to store CO2securely and permanently in the subsurface. In the current study, structural trapping, which shows the potential of initial CO2containment and integrity of the subsurface structure, is experimentally investigated with CO2leakage assessed. CO2containment is quantified by CO2column height, which describes the amount of CO2accumulated in the formation underneath seal rock and is controlled by a balance between capillary and gravitational forces acting on formation brine and invading CO2. While previous studies considered only contributions from seal rock (i.e., "nonrelative"), the current study examines a concurrent contribution from reservoir rock as a seal-reservoir "relative" column height since CO2storage as an analogy to petroleum reservoir is a structural trap consisting of the reservoir and impermeable seal covered. A distinctive discrepancy was found between the resultant relative and nonrelative column heights. The nonrelative column heights were positive (∼3000 m), implying a high potential for CO2storage. On the contrary, with reservoir rock contribution considered, the relative column heights were negative (∼-1800 m), suggesting CO2leakage through the structural trap. This was attributed to a relatively larger reservoir pore size (5.72 nm) than that of seal rock (4.04 nm). Hence, the contribution from reservoir rock characteristics is non-negligible when analyzing CO2storage potential. Owing to CO2dissolution in formation brine, CO2-induced effects including a geochemical reaction between acidic carbonated brine and rocks were also investigated. Rock dissolutions in both seal (claystone) and reservoir (limestone) rocks were observed with changes in the pore size, leading to lower storage potential. Further attempts to improve the column height were made by hydrophobizing seal rock via surfactant adsorption, although the changes were slight and could only facilitate a possible leakage (less negative height column).en_US
dc.subjectChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectEnergyen_US
dc.titleRelative CO<inf>2</inf>Column Height for CO<inf>2</inf>Geological Storage: A Non-Negligible Contribution from Reservoir Rock Characteristicsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleEnergy and Fuelsen_US
article.volume36en_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Portsmouthen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.