Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71615
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTaweewat Wiangkhamen_US
dc.contributor.authorNattawan Phungwattanakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatcharin Tedsombunen_US
dc.contributor.authorIsara Kongmeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorWanisara Suwanmongkhonen_US
dc.contributor.authorWeerapong Chidnoken_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-27T03:59:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-27T03:59:17Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18778879en_US
dc.identifier.issn18778860en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85096000120en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1515/sjpain-2020-0116en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85096000120&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71615-
dc.description.abstract© 2020 De Gruyter. All rights reserved. Objectives: Fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) is a self-report, valid and reliable questionnaire to quantify fear and avoidance beliefs related to physical activity and work. Furthermore, it can be used to predict prolong disability in patients with non-specific neck pain. Although it was originally developed to manage patients with low back pain, it has also been studied in individuals with neck pain. This questionnaire was translated into several languages following reports of potential benefits in patients with neck pain. Recently, Thai neck clinical trials, international multi-centre trials and data sharing are growing throughout the world but no validated Thai version of the FABQ is available for clinical and research uses. Our objectives were to translate and cross-culturally adapt the FABQ into Thai version and evaluate its psychometric properties in Thai patients with non-specific neck pain. Methods: Cross-cultural translation and adaptation of the FABQ were conducted according to standard guidelines. A total of 129 participants with non-specific neck pain were invited to complete the Thai versions of the FABQ (FABQ-TH), neck disability index and visual analogue scale for pain intensity. Psychometric evaluation included exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, agreement, and convergent validity. Thirty participants completed the FABQ-TH twice with a 48-h interval between tests to assess the test-retest reliability. Results: Factor analysis identified four components for the FABQ-TH (66.69% of the total variance). The intraclass correlation coefficient of test-retest reliability was excellent for the total score (0.986), work attitudes (0.995), physical activity attitudes (0.958), physical activity experiences (0.927), and expected recovery (0.984). Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was excellent (range 0.87-0.88) for all items. The minimal detectable change of the FABQ-TH was 5.85. The FABQ-TH correlated to its subscales (range 0.470-0.936), indicating the strongest association with work attitude. The weakest correlation was observed between the FABQ-TH and disability (rs=0.206, p=0.01). Missing data and significant floor or ceiling effects were not found. Conclusions: The Thai version of the FABQ for nonspecific neck pain was successfully adapted. It is a valid and reliable instrument to quantify fear and avoidance beliefs among patients with non-specific neck pain who speak and read Thai.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleTranslation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Thai version of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire in patients with non-specific neck painen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleScandinavian Journal of Painen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNaresuan Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.