Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62936
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSumet Supalaseten_US
dc.contributor.authorNapaporn Tananuvaten_US
dc.contributor.authorSaipin Pongsathaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWinai Chaidaroonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomsanguan Ausayakhunen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-14T03:41:44Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-14T03:41:44Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18791891en_US
dc.identifier.issn00029394en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85056265709en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.ajo.2018.09.021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056265709&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62936-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Elsevier Inc. Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QOL) of transdermal androgen in treatment of dry eye patients associated with androgen deficiency. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Methods: Fifty patients with dry eye from a tertiary eye center in northern Thailand were randomized to receive transdermal androgen (AndroGel; Besins Healthcare, Brussels, Belgium) or placebo for 4 weeks. Main outcome measures were symptoms and signs of dry eye. Serum level of sex hormone and QOL questionnaires were also evaluated at the baseline and after treatment. Results: After 4 weeks, the Ocular Surface Disease Index decreased significantly in the AndroGel group compared to the placebo (−14.36 ± 7.76 vs 0.14 ± 14.60, P <.001). Significant improvements of tear break-up time (7.40 ± 3.37 vs −1.14 ± 1.68 seconds, P <.001), corneal fluorescein staining (−0.62 ± 0.30 vs 0.19 ± 0.37, P <.001), and Schirmer test (6.84 ± 5.10 vs −0.48 ± 2.14 mm, P <.001) were observed in the AndroGel group compared to the placebo. Serum testosterone in female patients significantly increased in the AndroGel group compared to the placebo (P <.001), while no different change was observed in serum testosterone in male subjects and the sex hormone-binding globulin in both groups. In the AndroGel group, 20% of patients had oily skin and 4% had acne. No serious adverse effects were reported. The menopause rating score improved significantly in the AndroGel group compared to the placebo (P <.001), while the aging male symptoms were not different in both groups (P =.589). Conclusions: Transdermal androgen was effective in relieving symptoms and signs of dry eye as well as improving QOL in aging patients. There were no serious side effects during a short-term treatment.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleA Randomized Controlled Double-Masked Study of Transdermal Androgen in Dry Eye Patients Associated With Androgen Deficiencyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleAmerican Journal of Ophthalmologyen_US
article.volume197en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.