Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61802
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKrit Jaiwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanchana Nimmanhaemindaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSitthicha Siriareeen_US
dc.contributor.authorSurapan Khunamornpongen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-11T08:59:25Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-11T08:59:25Z-
dc.date.issued2006-11-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-33845492623en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33845492623&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61802-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the cytomorphologic quality of the cervical (Pap) smears between two fixation techniques, rehydration of air-dried smears (AD) versus wet fixation (WF). Material and Method: Paired-cervical smears (AD and WF) from 172 women who underwent cervical cytology screening at Chiang Mai University Hospital between August 2004 and September 2004 were prospectively evaluated for the cytologic parameters and the staining qualities. Results: The mean age of the 172 women was 41.7 years (± 2 SD 18.1), 27 women (15.7%) were postmenopausal. Absence of red blood cells in the smear background was significantly more frequent in AD smears than in WF specimens (p = 0.0006). Air-drying artifact was more frequent in AD smears compared to those of WF (p = 0.036) but was of only mild degree in all cases. There was no significant difference between AD and WF smears in the cytoplasmic quality including distinctness of cell border (p = 0.30) and satisfactory staining (p = 0.054). For the nuclear morphology, there was no significant difference between both fixation techniques in the distinctness of nuclear border (p = 0.26) and chromatin crispness (p = 0.23) of the endocervical nuclei. In squamous nuclei, AD smears had higher frequency of indistinct nuclear border and hazy chromatin compared to WF smears (p = 0.003 each). However, these were observed in only mild degree and did not affect the cytologic interpretation. Conclusion: The quality of AD smears was slightly inferior to WF smears but was still satisfactory for cervical cytology. AD technique may be acceptable as an alternative to wet fixation in cytologic cervical cancer screening.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe cytomorphologic comparison between rehydrated air-dried and conventional wet-fixed pap smearsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of the Medical Association of Thailanden_US
article.volume89en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.