Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61266
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRomanee Chaiwarithen_US
dc.contributor.authorCharussri Wachirakaphanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilai Kotarathititumen_US
dc.contributor.authorJutharat Praparatanaphanen_US
dc.contributor.authorThira Sirisanthanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKhuanchai Supparatpinyoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10T04:07:43Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-10T04:07:43Z-
dc.date.issued2007-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn12019712en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-34547795900en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.ijid.2006.11.003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34547795900&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61266-
dc.description.abstractObjective: We conducted a study to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of using CD4+ measurement and clinical evaluation to detect antiretroviral treatment failure in HIV-infected patients who had received their first regimen of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The secondary objective was to determine the prevalence and risk factors of virological failure. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand. Univariate analysis was performed to compare risk ratios between patients with and without virological failure. Sensitivity and specificity of the immunological and/or clinical criteria in comparison with virological criteria were calculated using 2 by 2 tables. Results: From January 2003 to December 2005, 327 HIV-infected patients were enrolled. The median follow-up period was 19 months (range 6-42 months). Virological failure was detected in 9.2% of patients. Patients with a previous history of opportunistic infection had a greater risk for developing virological failure (OR = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.1-6.4). Using the combined immunological and clinical criteria to detect antiretroviral treatment failure, the sensitivity was 20.0% and the specificity was 85.9%. Conclusions: Our study, which was limited by small numbers, was not able to demonstrate that immunological or clinical criteria can adequately replace virological criteria for the determination of treatment failure. © 2006 International Society for Infectious Diseases.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleSensitivity and specificity of using CD4+ measurement and clinical evaluation to determine antiretroviral treatment failure in Thailanden_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Infectious Diseasesen_US
article.volume11en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.