Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59800
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorK. Rerkasemen_US
dc.contributor.authorN. Kosachunhanunen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Tongpraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorK. Guntawongwanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10T03:21:38Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-10T03:21:38Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15526941en_US
dc.identifier.issn15347346en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-69449100054en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1177/1534734609344143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=69449100054&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59800-
dc.description.abstractThe consensus is that a multidisciplinary approach for patients with diabetic foot ulcer is effective in reducing the number of leg amputations. Concern remains, however, about cost and health-related quality of life issues. From August 2005 to March 2007, a multidisciplinary diabetic foot protocol (DFP) was used at the authorsĝ€™ teaching hospital.There were devices to reduce pressure on the foot.After healing, there were custom-fabricated orthoses and footwear, and monitoring of progress in ambulation. All subjects were educated about diabetic foot disease and its complications and prevention.They were also instructed to call and visit the hospital if there were any signs of new lesions.This study compared responses to the short form 36 questionnaires (SF-36) about health-related quality of life and the cost of medical care for patients receiving DFP care from August 2005 to March 2007 and those who had standard care from August 2003 to July 2005.There were 56 and 40 diabetic foot ulcer patients on DFP and standard care packages, respectively. Their gender distribution and mean age were similar. The average total cost of DFP patients was significantly lower than that for standard care patients ($1127.02 and $1824.58, respectively, P =.02). DFP patients had significantly higher scores on the SF-36 for both the physical and mental health dimensions than standard care patients. It was concluded that DFP was less expensive and gave patients a better quality of life, compared to standard care. On the basis of this finding, DFP should be used by every hospital to improve outcomes for patients with diabetic foot ulcer.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleA multidisciplinary diabetic foot protocol at chiang mai university hospital: Cost and quality of lifeen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Lower Extremity Woundsen_US
article.volume8en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.