Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59218
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSakgasit Ramingwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorLachana Ramingwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorKenneth Coshen_US
dc.contributor.authorNarissara Eiamkanitchaten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T06:55:17Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T06:55:17Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn21945357en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85049601895en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1007/978-3-319-93692-5_31en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85049601895&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59218-
dc.description.abstract© 2019, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature. Learning through simulation is an efficient method for illustrating the essentials of Scrum software development to those who are interested in further understanding modern software engineering techniques. Several models of simulations have been proposed in attempts to match needs and simulation environments. This paper compares the efficiency of two variations of Scrum simulation; the original “Scrum simulation with LEGO bricks” and the economic alternative “Plasticine Scrum”. Similarities, differences, advantages and disadvantages of both models are discussed in the findings.en_US
dc.subjectComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.titleA comparative study on scrum simulationsen_US
dc.typeBook Seriesen_US
article.title.sourcetitleAdvances in Intelligent Systems and Computingen_US
article.volume769en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.