Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59005
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSrisuda Assawapalanggoolen_US
dc.contributor.authorNongyao Kasatpibalen_US
dc.contributor.authorSupatra Sirichotiyakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorRajin Aroraen_US
dc.contributor.authorWatcharin Suntornlimsirien_US
dc.contributor.authorAnucha Apisarnthanaraken_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T04:36:19Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T04:36:19Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-22en_US
dc.identifier.issn20472994en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85040861095en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s13756-018-0304-6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85040861095&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59005-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 The Author(s). Background: Cesarean surgical site infections (SSIs) can be prevented by proper preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Differences in antibiotic selection in clinical practice exist according to obstetricians' preferences despite clear guidelines on preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ampicillin and ceftriaxone in preventing cesarean SSIs. Methods: The observational prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Thailand from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2012. Propensity scores for ceftriaxone prophylaxis were calculated from potential influencing confounders. The cesarean SSI rates of the ceftriaxone group vs. those of the ampicillin prophylactic group were estimated by multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression nested by propensity score. Results: Data of 4149 cesarean patients were collected. Among these, 911 patients received ceftriaxone whereas 3238 patients received ampicillin as preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The incidence of incisional SSIs was (0.1% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.001) and organ space SSIs was (1.2% vs. 2.9%; p = 0.003) in the ceftriaxone group compared with the ampicillin group. After adjusting for confounders, the rate ratios of incisional and organ/space SSIs in the ceftriaxone compared with the ampicillin group did not differ (RR, 0.23; 95% CI 0.03-1.78), and (RR, 1.62; 95% CI 0.83-3.18), respectively. Conclusion: These data indicate no difference exists between ampicillin and ceftriaxone to prevent SSIs after cesarean section. Ampicillin may be used as antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe efficacy of ampicillin compared with ceftriaxone on preventing cesarean surgical site infections: An observational prospective cohort studyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Controlen_US
article.volume7en_US
article.stream.affiliationsMae Sot General Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsLampang Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNakornping Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsThammasat University Hospitalen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.