Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57710
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTadanobu Onishien_US
dc.contributor.authorShohei Omokawaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAkio Iidaen_US
dc.contributor.authorYasuaki Nakanishien_US
dc.contributor.authorTsutomu Kiraen_US
dc.contributor.authorHisao Moritomoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSompob Ruxasagluwangen_US
dc.contributor.authorJirchart Kraisarinen_US
dc.contributor.authorTakamasa Shimizuen_US
dc.contributor.authorYasuhito Tanakaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T03:48:29Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T03:48:29Z-
dc.date.issued2017-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1554527Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn07360266en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84983509077en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1002/jor.23355en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84983509077&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57710-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. We investigated the reliability and accuracy of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) ballottement test using five fresh-frozen cadaver specimens in triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC)-intact, and TFCC-sectioned wrists. The humerus and proximal ulna were fixed. The ulna was allowed to translate in dorsopalmar directions without rotation, and the radius was allowed to move freely. Four sensors of a magnetic tracking system were attached to the radius and ulna, and the nails of each examiner's thumbs. Five examiners conducted the DRUJ ballottement test before and after TFCC sectioning. We used two techniques: With holding and without holding the carpal bones to the radius (holding and non-holding tests, respectively). We compared the magnitudes of bone-to-bone (absolute DRUJ) movement with that of the examiner's nail-to-nail (relative DRUJ) movement. The intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were 0.92 (holding) and 0.94 (non-holding). The interrater ICCs were 0.84 (holding) and 0.75 (non-holding). Magnitudes of absolute and relative movements averaged 11.5 and 11.8 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). Before TFCC sectioning, the DRUJ movement during the holding and non-holding techniques averaged 9.8 and 10.8 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). The increase in DRUJ movement after TFCC sectioning was greater with the holding technique (average 2.3 mm) than with the non-holding technique (average 1.6 mm). The DRUJ ballottement test with magnetic markers is relatively accurate and reliable for detecting unstable joints. We recommend the holding technique for assessing DRUJ instability in clinical practice. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1123–1127, 2017.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleBiomechanical study of distal radioulnar joint ballottement testen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Orthopaedic Researchen_US
article.volume35en_US
article.stream.affiliationsNara Medical Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsOsaka Yukioka College of Health Scienceen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.