Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55631
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNattida Khumsarnen_US
dc.contributor.authorVirush Patanapornen_US
dc.contributor.authorApirum Janhomen_US
dc.contributor.authorDhirawat Jotikasthiraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T02:59:02Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T02:59:02Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn22337830en_US
dc.identifier.issn22337822en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84978121131en_US
dc.identifier.other10.5624/isd.2016.46.2.117en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84978121131&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55631-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Purpose: This study evaluated and compared interradicular distances and cortical bone thickness in Thai patients with Class I and Class II skeletal patterns, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: Pretreatment CBCT images of 24 Thai orthodontic patients with Class I and Class II skeletal patterns were included in the study. Three measurements were chosen for investigation: the mesiodistal distance between the roots, the width of the buccolingual alveolar process, and buccal cortical bone thickness. All distances were recorded at five different levels from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Descriptive statistical analysis and t-tests were performed, with the significance level for all tests set at p<0.05. Results: Patients with a Class II skeletal pattern showed significantly greater maxillary mesiodistal distances (between the first and second premolars) and widths of the buccolingual alveolar process (between the first and second molars) than Class I skeletal pattern patients at 10 mm above the CEJ. The maxillary buccal cortical bone thicknesses between the second premolar and first molar at 8 mm above the CEJ in Class II patients were likewise significantly greater than in Class I patients. Patients with a Class I skeletal pattern showed significantly wider mandibular buccolingual alveolar processes than did Class II patients (between the first and second molars) at 4, 6, and 8 mm below the CEJ. Conclusion: In both the maxilla and mandible, the mesiodistal distances, the width of the buccolingual alveolar process, and buccal cortical bone thickness tended to increase from the CEJ to the apex in both Class I and Class II skeletal patterns.en_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.subjectHealth Professionsen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparison of interradicular distances and cortical bone thickness in Thai patients with class I and class II skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleImaging Science in Dentistryen_US
article.volume46en_US
article.stream.affiliationsLamphun Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.