Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55116
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVictor T. Kingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T02:51:56Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T02:51:56Z-
dc.date.issued2016-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn22318534en_US
dc.identifier.issn01287702en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84959386789en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84959386789&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55116-
dc.description.abstract© Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. Debates concerning the definition of Southeast Asia as a region are intense and on-going, and the delimitation and rationale for regional analysis have become increasingly problematical in the era of globalisation. Southeast Asia is characterised, though not clearly and unequivocally defined by cultural diversity and openness. It has a long history of cultural connections with other parts of the world and it demonstrates the importance of physical migrations and cultural flows into, across and out of the region, which have generated cross-cultural encounters and social intercourse, with the Indian sub-continent, East Asia, the Middle East, Europe and the Americas. These interactions have in turn resulted in cultural hybridisation, synthesis and mixed or mestizo communities, the phenomena of pluralism and multiculturalism within national boundaries, and in the co-existence of culturally different majority and minority populations. The processes of cultural differentiation and interaction have made Southeast Asia one of the most culturally complex regions in the world and have complicated the process of regional definition. In spite of these cultural complexities, there are those who have argued that it is 'the ubiquity of publicly displayed cultural forms' and the fact that Southeast Asia is 'arguably the best place to look for culture' which serves to define it as a region. The centrality of culture in the definition of this region will be explored and it is proposed that the conceptualisation of the relationship between culture and identity might be a way forward in addressing these regional complexities.en_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectBusiness, Management and Accountingen_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Financeen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleConceptualising culture, identity and region: Recent reflections on Southeast Asiaen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitlePertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanitiesen_US
article.volume24en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Leedsen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.