Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55114
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAshley Southen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarie Lallen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T02:51:55Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T02:51:55Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0129797Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84964211320en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1355/cs38-1fen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84964211320&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55114-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. This article analyses the relationship between the politics of education and language, and armed conflict and ongoing peace process in Myanmar. It discusses the state education system, which since the military coup of 1962 has promoted the idea of the country based on the language and culture of the Bamar (Burman) majority community, and the school systems developed by ethnic armed groups which oppose the military government. Ethnic opposition education regimes have developed mother tongue-based school systems. In some cases, the Mon for example, these broadly follow the government curriculum, while being locally owned and delivered in ethnic languages; in others, such as the Karen, the local education system diverges significantly from the Myanmar government curriculum, making it difficult for students to transition between the two systems. This article explores the consequences of these developments, and how reforms in Myanmar since 2011 — including the peace process, which remains incomplete and contested — have opened the space for educational reform, and the possible “convergence” of state and non-state education regimes. Ethnic nationality communities remain determined to conserve and reproduce their own languages and cultures, adopting positions in relation to language and education which reflect broader state-society relations in Myanmar, and in particular ethnic politicians’ demands for a federal political settlement to decades of armed conflict. The article concludes that sustainable resolution to Myanmar’s protracted state-society conflict is unlikely to be achieved until elites can negotiate agreement on ethnic language and teaching policies.en_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleLanguage, Education and the peace process in Myanmaren_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleContemporary Southeast Asiaen_US
article.volume38en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUCL Institute of Educationen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.