Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChompoonoot Kasemseten_US
dc.contributor.authorChawis Boonmeeen_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. The objective of this research was to study the effect of applying direct or indirect cost allocation methods in Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) analysis. Meatball production was selected as the case study. The direct method focused on the processes with large quantities of waste for improvement, without regard to the cost of the material wasted. On the other hand, the indirect method, which allocates cost based on the cost of materials, focused on the processes with the most costly waste in its improvement solutions. Thus, the different methods of cost allocation could target different process(es) for improvement. When materials used in a target product had the same cost and the quantity of waste was easily measured in the same unit, the direct and indirect cost allocation methods provided similar results. But when input materials differed in their costs and measurement units, the indirect cost allocation method was recommended.en_US
dc.titleDifferent cost allocation methods in Material Flow Cost Accounting: A case study of waste reduction in Thai meatball productionen_US
article.title.sourcetitleChiang Mai University Journal of Natural Sciencesen_US
article.volume14en_US Mai Universityen_US Institute of Technologyen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.