Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53278
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSuthipong Chujanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNakarin Kitkumthornen_US
dc.contributor.authorSumalee Siriangkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorApiwat Mutiranguraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:46:16Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:46:16Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15137368en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84908031784en_US
dc.identifier.other10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.18.7971en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84908031784&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53278-
dc.description.abstractBackground: From our previous study, we established that cyclin A1 (CCNA1) promoter methylation is strongly correlated with multistep progression of HPV-associated cervical cancer, suggesting potential use as a diagnostic maker of disease. Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to assess the prevalence of CCNA1 promoter methylation in residual cervical cells isolated from liquid-based cytology that underwent hrHPV DNA screening for cervical cancer, and then to evaluate this marker for diagnostic accuracy using parameters like sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratio. Methods: In this retrospective study, histopathology was used as the gold standard method with specimens separated into the following groups: negative (n=31), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL, n=34) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+, n=32). The hrHPV was detected by Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) and CCNA1 promoter methylation was examined by CCNA1 duplex methylation specific PCR. Results: The results showed the frequencies of CCNA1 promoter methylation were 0%, 5.88% and 83.33%, while the percentages of hrHPV were 66.67%, 82.35% and 100% in the negative, LSIL and HSIL+ groups, respectively. Although hrHPV infection showed high frequency in all three groups, it could not differentiate between the different groups and grades of precancerous lesions. In contrast, CCNA1 promoter methylation clearly distinguished between negative/LSIL and HSIL+, with high levels of all statistic parameters. Conclusion: CCNA1 promoter methylation is a potential marker for distinguishing between histologic negative/LSIL and HSIL+using cervical cytology samples.en_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleCCNA1 promoter methylation: A potential marker for grading papanicolaou smear cervical squamous intraepithelial lesionsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Preventionen_US
article.volume15en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChulalongkorn Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsMahidol Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.