Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53121
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPhimphakan Lebelen_US
dc.contributor.authorNiwooti Whangchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorChanagun Chitmanaten_US
dc.contributor.authorJongkon Promyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLouis Lebelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:43:58Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:43:58Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15450805en_US
dc.identifier.issn10454438en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84896478303en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1080/10454438.2014.877731en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84896478303&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53121-
dc.description.abstractAquaculture in rivers and other public water bodies raises issues of access and property rights. Over the past few years an industry has developed around the rearing of hybrid red and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) in cages in the Ping River in northern Thailand. In this article we report on a study of how households gain access to river cage sites to farm fish. The findings are based on a case-control study of 400 households, half of which had a history of fish farming and half which did not. Additional information was gathered from qualitative in-depth interviews with 93 stakeholders. Households with good access to farming sites, financial capital, and social networks are more likely to farm fish. Proximity to the river front was a very important factor and operated at a micro-level within villages with river borders. Land and vehicle assets were also associated with fish farming-more so than monthly income levels-probably because they reflect access to credit. Social capital measured as belonging to various kinds of groups was also associated with fish farming, but may have been in part an outcome rather than a pre-requisite. Many fish farmers start through encouragement and invitations by firms or the fisheries department. Sites for cage aquaculture in rivers have characteristics somewhere between a private and a club good: those who don't live near the river are usually excluded, but rivalry for sites among those who live close becomes an issue with congestion of farms arising from expansion in number of cages or other factors that reduce availability of suitable rearing sites like variability in climate, water flows, water quality, and government regulations. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.en_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleAccess to Fish Cage Aquaculture in the Ping River, Northern Thailanden_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Applied Aquacultureen_US
article.volume26en_US
article.stream.affiliationsMaejo Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.