Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52820
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAsama Vanichtantikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorKittipat Charoenkwanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:32:50Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:32:50Z-
dc.date.issued2013-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1873233Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn00297844en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84883223240en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829d888een_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84883223240&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52820-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE:: To examine the effectiveness of lidocaine spray compared with conventional lidocaine submucosal injection during a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). METHODS:: Women undergoing LEEP for any degrees of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia were invited to participate. The participants were randomly assigned into two groups. In group 1 (injection), the participants were anesthetized with 1.8 mL (36 mg) of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine injected submucosally using a pressure syringe injector with a 27-gauge needle tip at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock locations of the ectocervix. For group 2 (spray), the patients were locally anesthetized with four puffs (40 mg) of 10% lidocaine spray applied thoroughly to the ectocervix. The patients rated their pain according to a 10-cm visual analog scale at different points during the procedure including baseline, postanesthesia, excision, and 30 minutes postexcision. Primary outcomes were the excision pain score and its difference from the baseline. RESULTS:: One hundred one patients (51 in the injection group and 50 in the spray group) participated in the study. The baseline pain scores, the excision pain scores, the difference between the excision and the baseline pain scores, and the postexcision pain scores were comparable between the study groups. The median postanesthesia pain score and the median difference of the postanesthesia score from baseline were significantly higher in the injection group, 3.4 compared with 0.6 and 1.9 compared with 0.0, respectively (P<.01). CONCLUSION:: Lidocaine spray is an effective and practical alternative measure for reducing pain associated with electrical excision of the cervix during LEEP. © 2013 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleLidocaine spray compared with submucosal injection for reducing pain during loop electrosurgical excision procedure: A randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleObstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
article.volume122en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.