Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52604
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSuwanna Praneetvatakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPepijn Schreinemachersen_US
dc.contributor.authorPiyatat Pananuraken_US
dc.contributor.authorPrasnee Tipraqsaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:28:03Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:28:03Z-
dc.date.issued2013-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18736416en_US
dc.identifier.issn14629011en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84871749558en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84871749558&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52604-
dc.description.abstractThis study addresses the questions of how to estimate the external costs of agricultural pesticide use and how to disaggregate these costs to particular chemicals and farm production systems. Using the case of Thailand-a lower-middle income country with an export-oriented agriculture and an annual growth in pesticide use of about 10%, we estimate the external costs of pesticide use for the period 1997-2010 by applying the Pesticide Environmental Accounting (PEA) tool and compare the estimates to an accounting of actual costs for two years. We also use the tool to estimate the external costs of two distinct production systems of rice and intensive horticulture. Using the PEA tool, we estimate the average external costs of pesticide use in Thailand to be USD 27.1/ha of agricultural land in 2010; yet the actual cost estimate for the same year is only USD 18.7/ha. This difference leads us to discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the PEA approach. The negative externalities of pesticide use could be reduced by giving farmers a financial incentive to use fewer pesticides, for instance by introducing an environmental tax. We argue that for such instrument to be effective, it needs to be combined with supportive measures to change on-farm practices through awareness-raising about the adverse effects of pesticides and introducing farmers to non-chemical alternatives to manage their pest problems. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titlePesticides, external costs and policy options for Thai agricultureen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleEnvironmental Science and Policyen_US
article.volume27en_US
article.stream.affiliationsKasetsart Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversitat Hohenheimen_US
article.stream.affiliationsKnowledge Network Institute of Thailanden_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.