Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51942
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNongyao Kasatpibalen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilawan Senaratanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJittaporn Chitreecheuren_US
dc.contributor.authorNarain Chotirosniramiten_US
dc.contributor.authorParichat Pakvipasen_US
dc.contributor.authorPuangnipa Junthasopeepunen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T06:12:05Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T06:12:05Z-
dc.date.issued2012-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15578674en_US
dc.identifier.issn10962964en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84858142571en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1089/sur.2011.043en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84858142571&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51942-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Compliance with the World Health Organization (WHO) surgical safety checklist may reduce preventable adverse events. However, compliance may be difficult to implement in Thailand. This study was conducted to examine compliance with the WHO checklist at a Thai university hospital. Methods: A descriptive study was conducted among 4,340 patients undergoing surgery in nine departments from March to August 2009. The compliance rates were computed. Results: The highest compliance rate (91.4%) during the sign-in period was with patients' confirmation of their identity, operative site, procedure, and consent. However, only 19.4% of the surgical sites were marked. In the time-out period, surgical teams had introduced themselves by name and role in 79% of the operations; and in 95.7% of the cases, the patient's name, the incision site, and the procedure had been confirmed. Antibiotic prophylaxis had been given within 60 min before the incision in 71% of the cases. For 83% of the operations, the surgeons reviewed crucial events whereas only 78.4% were reviewed by the anesthetists. Sterility had been confirmed by the operating room nurses for every patient, but the essential imaging was displayed at a rate of only 64.4%. In the sign-out period, nurses correctly confirmed the name of the procedure orally in 99.5% of the cases. Instrument, sponge, and needle counts were completed and the specimen was labeled in most cases, 96.8% and 97.6%, respectively. Equipment-related problems were identified in 4.4% of the cases, and 100% of them were addressed. The surgeon, anesthetist, and nurse reviewed the key concerns for recovery and management of the patient at the rate of 85.1%. Conclusions: The WHO checklist can be implemented in a developing country. However, compliance with some items was extremely low, reflecting different work patterns and cultural norms. Additional education and enforcement of checklist use is needed to improve compliance. © 2012, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleImplementation of the world health organization surgical safety checklist at a university hospital in Thailanden_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleSurgical Infectionsen_US
article.volume13en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.