Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50459
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorElizabeth A. Bergeyen_US
dc.contributor.authorPensri Bunlueen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomyot Silalomen_US
dc.contributor.authorDecha Thapanyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPorntip Chantaramongkolen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T04:41:16Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T04:41:16Z-
dc.date.issued2010-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn08873593en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-80855138902en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1899/09-068.1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80855138902&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50459-
dc.description.abstractFlow variation associated with hydropower production causes periodic exposure of zones along the banks of regulated rivers. These zones have reduced algal biomass and lower productivity. We investigated whether algal assemblages in regulated rivers differed in tolerance to aerial exposure because understanding such tolerance could be used to alter water releases to improve downstream productivity. In field experiments, we tested algal tolerance to aerial exposure in 3 assemblages: green filamentous and cyanobacterial assemblages in Thailand and a mixed (filamentous green + cyanobacteria) assemblage in New Zealand. Algae-bearing stones were exposed at night, during the day (in sun or shade, with or without simulated rain), or continuously, or were continuously submerged (with a handling control). Exposure reduced cyanobacterial chlorophyll a, and reduction was greater with day than with night exposure. Mixed algal assemblages showed a similar pattern in chlorophyll a, but ash-free dry mass (AFDM) did not change (bleached algae remained). In contrast, green filamentous algae survived better when exposed than when submerged, and when exposed during the day than at night. Snails consumed green filamentous algae, and submersion resulted in high grazing loss of filamentous algae but not cyanobacteria. Grazing pressure was presumably lower at night during water release. For cyanobacteria, shade and rain slightly increased chlorophyll a retention. For filamentous green algae, shade had no effect, and rain was beneficial in the shade but not the sun. Our experiments demonstrated an interaction among variable hydraulic conditions, activity of grazing snails, and availability of grazing-susceptible algae. A longer wet-dry cycle, daytime water release, and a shaded riparian zone reduced aerial exposure effects on algal assemblages, indicating that water releases can be regulated to improve productivity in the downstream exposed zone.en_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.titleEnvironmental and biological factors affect desiccation tolerance of algae from two rivers (Thailand and New Zealand) with fluctuating flowen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of the North American Benthological Societyen_US
article.volume29en_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Oklahomaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.